| July 1, 2008
Treatment Can Make Cancer Stronger
What doesn't kill cancer cells makes them stronger, Duke researchers have observed.
Doctors use radiation and chemotherapy to destroy cancer cells. About half of patients are cured – that is, all of their tumor cells die.
The other half of the time, some tumor cells survive treatment. These cancer cells are more aggressive than they were before treatment, says Mark W. Dewhirst, DVM, PhD, professor of radiation oncology at Duke University.
"When you give a tumor treatment, whatever cells survive are going to be more resistant to that treatment," Dewhirst tells WebMD. "Those not killed are healthier cancer cells."
This does not mean radiation and chemotherapy don't work. It does mean that additional new treatments will be needed. And to know what treatments will work best, Dewhirst says doctors need to know how cancer cells survive radiation and chemotherapy.
The key may be a protein called HIF – hypoxia-inducing factor. Government, university, and drug-company researchers are racing to develop new drugs that inhibit HIF. But patients may not have to wait that long: Existing drugs, already approved by the FDA for cancer treatment, turn out to be potent anti-HIF agents.
Why is HIF suddenly a big deal? It's the key to a different way of looking at cancers.
A 'New' Theory of Cancer
It's been known for about 50 years that solid tumors have areas that don't get much blood – and that cells in these areas survive without much oxygen.
For a long time, this was thought to be an interesting curiosity. But now the ability of cancer cells to survive without oxygen – to become hypoxic – is being seen as a driver of cancer progression.
"A cancer cell that doesn't get much oxygen is like a rat deserting a sinking ship," Dewhirst says. "It will do things to try to help itself."
So the cell does four things:
- It sends out a signal for help, asking the body to grow more blood vessels in the tumor.
- It changes the way it eats, switching from oxygen metabolism to anaerobic metabolism.
- It prepares itself for the day it gets help, building defenses against a burst of oxygen molecules that is toxic to anaerobic cells.
- And the cell is going to try to get out of there – to invade a blood vessel and go somewhere else in the body to grow.
Each of these things makes cancer worse:
- New blood vessels let the tumor grow larger.
- Cells that don't use oxygen are much less sensitive to chemotherapy and radiation.
- Cells resistant to bursts of oxygen (oxidative stress) also are resistant to some of the ways the body gets rid of cancer cells.
- Cells that wander spread cancer to distant parts of the body.
Johns Hopkins researcher Gregg Semenza, MD, PhD, calls this discovery one of the four "major conceptual advances over the last century which have the potential to revolutionize cancer therapy."
Part of that revolution has been Semenza's discovery (also made independently by Oxford researcher Peter Ratcliffe, MD) of HIF-1. HIF-1 is the signal that transforms a cell from an oxygen-using cell to an anaerobic cell.
HIF: Key to Cancer Treatment Success?
"It's been shown that in a variety of different cancer types, those with most HIF-1 have the worst outcome," Semenza tells WebMD. "The basis for this is the fact that HIF-1 controls the expression of hundreds of genes that play critical roles in cancer biology."
One of the first researchers to start looking for drugs that target HIF-1 is oncologist Giovanni Melillo, MD, of the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI). After screening hundreds of compounds for anti-HIF activity, Melillo and colleagues made a surprising discovery: A number of existing cancer chemotherapies turn out to inhibit HIF.
The most potent, Melillo says, is a drug called topotecan, marketed under the brand name Hycamtin. It's already approved by the FDA as a second-line treatment for ovarian and small-cell lung cancers. So why isn't this drug already revolutionizing cancer treatment?
"The key to this treatment is the dose," Melillo tells WebMD. "For chemotherapy, one usually gives the maximum tolerated dose. And the timing is important, because when topotecan is used as chemotherapy one needs to let the patient recover from toxicity. We propose to give lower doses of topotecan daily to achieve this effect on HIF-1 in a nontoxic fashion."
Indeed, in an NCI clinical trial, Melillo and colleagues found that topotecan given this way does not have the toxic effects seen when the drug is used in massive doses as a chemotherapy.
But if cancer researchers have learned one thing, it is that no single type of treatment is going to cure cancer.
"Successful treatment of tuberculosis requires the administration of three antibiotics; successful treatment of AIDS requires the administration of three antiviral agents," Semenza recently wrote. "It is not reasonable to expect that the successful treatment of cancer can be accomplished reliably with any fewer than three anticancer agents."
Semenza, Dewhirst, and Melillo agree that HIF-1 inhibitors will have major effects only when combined with other agents.
Dewhirst proposes using such inhibitors along with radiation and chemotherapy. Melillo and Semenza are excited about using the drugs with angiogenesis inhibitors, such as Avastin, which prevent tumors from growing new blood vessels.
Melillo's team is planning a clinical trial testing Avastin in combination with topotecan. And Dewhirst and colleagues have just completed an early safety study of another HIF-1 inhibitor, ENMD-1198 from EntreMed Inc. (Dewhirst has no financial interest in the company).
"HIF-1 inhibition is a very exciting opportunity for cancer treatment," Dewhirst says.
Source: Dewhirst, Nature Reviews Cancer, June 2008; vol 8: pp 425-438. Semenza, G.L. Drug Discovery Today, October 2007; vol 12: pp 853-859.
Author: Daniel J. DeNoon, WebMD Medical News
Reviewed By: Louise Chang, MD
Source: http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=90173
Comment:
Almost four decades after declaring the war on cancer, a satisfactory and curative cancer treatment is still not a reality. Researchers continue to contemplate different ideas about the development of cancer and its spread, and they are trying desperately to arrive at a conclusion in the hopes to find the cure. Articles and studies like this only highlight the failure of drug companies to find any solution, while cancer remains the second leading cause of death in most of the developed countries in the world. However, they are prompt to emphasize the fact that patients should still continue with radiation and chemotherapy – the treatments, which sometimes prove more harmful than the disease itself! In addition, they underline that "no single type of treatment is going to cure cancer." Giving the example of tuberculosis and AIDS where the pathogens develop resistance to standard treatment thus requiring multiple drugs; cancer treatment should also consist of multiple drugs attacking different targets such as killing cancer cells, preventing metastasis, decreasing angiogenesis, etc. Cancer patients already fighting with the disease, are given additional harmful drugs that also harm healthy organ systems in the body, further deteriorating their health.
With their eyes on only one goal, that is, expanding the business with disease, pharmaceutical companies do not have enough incentive to find a real cure for any of diseases. They will be more profitable if people continue to take multiple medications for as long as possible, even if it harms the population to a great extent. Dr. Rath's Research Institute has proven the safety and efficacy of a synergistic combination of natural nutrients in various chronic diseases including cancer, cardiovascular disease, inflammatory diseases and certain types of infections such as tuberculosis, symptoms of AIDS, influenza and so on. However because of this proven fact that such a nutrient combination could potentially reverse these diseases, pharmaceutical companies are not interested in pursuing this option any further, and are investing additional resources to prove that vitamins are dangerous. Dr. Rath has been unveiling such unethical practices by the pharmaceutical companies for more than a decade. At the same time, scientists at Dr. Rath's Research Institute are conducting extensive laboratory and clinical trials to substantiate Dr. Rath's discoveries.
Read more about Dr. Rath's research and the fight against the pharmaceutical cartel at http://www.drrathresearch.org
|
|